Decision support for digital twins

Decide on what the data prove, not on what they seem to show.

AllDecisionAI connects to your digital twins, checks whether the relations in the data are really causal, and only then recommends decisions, always with the level of evidence in plain sight.

In development: we are looking for partner organisations for the pilot.
AllOntology curated data, with meaning AllDecisionAI hypotheses → causal verification → decision Digital twin real state and simulation of the asset data data gaps relations and decisions verification requests

Correlation is not a decision.

Data show well what goes together. But almost every decision asks something else: what happens if I change this?

what the data seem to say

"Faster triage, faster diagnosis."

Patients triaged quickly are also diagnosed quickly. The obvious conclusion would be to invest in speeding up triage.

what AllDecisionAI checks

Severity explains both.

Simple cases are fast at every step. Controlling for severity, the effect of triage disappears. What really shortens diagnosis is the time spent on tests.

How it works

Every recommendation goes through the same process, and every step is recorded.

Connect

Receives curated data from AllOntology, from one or more sources, and the state of the digital twins.

Discover

Proposes cause-and-effect hypotheses from the data. Digital twins can also ask for verifications.

Verify

Tests each hypothesis on held-out data, with refutation tests and correction for multiple comparisons.

Decide and learn

Simulates scenarios, recommends options, measures the actual outcome and reviews relations when the data change.

Every relation gets a verdict

The platform always says how solid the evidence behind a recommendation is.

causal

The effect exists and has been measured. It can support decisions and be published to the digital twin.

correlation only

They go together, but the cause is not proven. It only enters with an explicit warning.

inconclusive

There is not enough data. The platform says what is missing or proposes a test.

rejected

There is no relevant effect. The rejection is shared too, so it is not assumed again.

12 questions, from what happened to what to do

For each dataset, the platform first says which questions the data can answer, and why, then answers them with the right method.

Descriptive

  1. How much?
  2. How does it evolve?
  3. How does it compare?
  4. Who are they?

Diagnostic

  1. What goes together?
  2. Why?
  3. What is odd?
  4. Where is it lost?

Predictive

  1. What will happen?

Prescriptive

  1. What if I do X?
  2. How do I get there?
  3. What if it goes wrong?

Capabilities

Built for people who have to justify decisions, not just make them.

Causal engine

Causal structure discovery, adjusted estimation, refutation tests and verdicts with explicit criteria.

Dialogue with digital twins

Answers verification requests and publishes only relations that are validated and approved by experts.

Traps detected

Confounding variables, reverse causation, Simpson's paradox, effects that change over time, and open cases that flatter recent data.

Scenarios and recommendation

What-if simulation with uncertainty, waiting lists and queues, optimisation at the lowest cost and stress tests.

Full audit trail

Pre-registered plan, history of each relation and a record of who approved each decision.

Any data source

Tables from different systems, joined by key or by time, without depending on one format.

Where it applies

In any operation with a digital twin and decisions that cost a lot when they are wrong.

Healthcare

Emergency flows, rosters, waiting times and capacity.

Manufacturing

Defects, maintenance, line speed and energy use.

Energy and cities

Demand, grids, mobility and urban services.

Logistics

Lead times, routes, stock and service levels.

Join the pilot

We are looking for organisations with historical data and a digital twin, or plans to have one, to validate AllDecisionAI in a real setting.

Already a partner? Sign in to the platform.